<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • 腦中風患者接受住院復健治療預后功能的研究

    時間:2024-08-13 06:25:33 醫(yī)學畢業(yè)論文 我要投稿
    • 相關(guān)推薦

    腦中風患者接受住院復健治療預后功能的研究

      
        
    【關(guān) 鍵 詞】
    腦中風Stroke
    預后Prognosis
    功能結(jié)果Functional outcomes
    復健治療Rehabilitation therapy

    【論文類別】 博士論文
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    【中文摘要】
    本前瞻性研究目的主要調(diào)查與探討民國八十六年一月至十二月期間163位住院高雄醫(yī)學大學
    附設(shè)中和醫(yī)院復健科接受復健治療的腦中風患者,其社會人口學及住院期間診斷評估臨床
    數(shù)據(jù)、其復健治療效益性、出院時日常生活功能預后進步情形和相關(guān)預測因子、影響住院
    天數(shù)長短的預測因子、出院至少六個月預后功能獨立自主和使用長期照護機構(gòu)的影響因素
    和生活型態(tài)改變的情形。
    我們的研究結(jié)果顯示:日常生活能力以功能獨立自主量表(Functional Independence
    Measure, FIM)分數(shù)為指標,在住院期間無論全部項目得分或其六大類別得分的進步量在統(tǒng)
    計學上都有顯著的意義。這個結(jié)果可以說明復健治療對于中風病人的預后結(jié)果扮演重要的
    正面角色。影響出院時FIM量表得分的重要預測因子包括年齡、多次中風病史、住院期間多
    項并發(fā)癥、定向能力異常及神經(jīng)心理功能異常暨失智癥等;而感覺異常和多次中風病史患
    者是影響住院期間功能獨立自主量表進步量的重要預測因子。
    住院時FIM量表平均得分57.7 ± 24.5;出院前77.3 ± 26.3。住院期間復健效率平均得分
    0.7 ± 0.7和復健效果30.6 ± 24.0%。對于復健治療效率而言,在統(tǒng)計學上有意義的預測
    因子包括復健治療住院天數(shù)和患側(cè)上肢近端肢體運動功能恢復級數(shù),兩項因素可以解釋復
    健治療效率21%的變異量;對于復健治療效果而言,在統(tǒng)計學上有意義的預測因子包括年齡
    和患側(cè)上肢近端肢體運動功能恢復級數(shù),兩項因素可以解釋復健治療效果24%的變異量。
    住院初期以福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)評估平衡能力可以解釋
    接受復健治療住院天數(shù)6%的變異量及復健治療效率3%的變異量;然而,平衡能力無法提供
    解釋住院期間FIM得分進步情形的變異量。這些結(jié)果說明住院復健初期臨床使用FMBS量表來
    評估平衡能力似乎無法有效預測中風病患接受復健治療預后功能結(jié)果。
    住院時FIM量表得分能力、是否肩關(guān)節(jié)有半脫位、是否兩側(cè)肢體運動功能皆受損和接受教育
    年數(shù)是為住院天數(shù)長短的的重要預測因子。這些重要預測因子可以解釋住院天數(shù)長短21.5%
    的變異量。這些結(jié)果可以做為未來腦中風患者接受住院復健治療健保給付規(guī)劃論病例計酬
    標準的參考。
    出院半年后共完成142位個案日常生活狀態(tài)的追蹤訪視,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)訪視時日常生活功能完全
    獨立者共有23位(16.2%)。住院時加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)得
    分能力和住院時FIM量表得分能力可為中風病患復健治療出院半年后生活功能是否獨立自主
    的重要預測因子。
    有關(guān)使用長期照護機構(gòu)方面,這部份共完成151位個案的追蹤訪視。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)訪視時正住在
    長期照護機構(gòu)者共有23位(15.2%)。邏輯回歸分析結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),兩側(cè)肢體運動功能是否皆受損
    、出院時意識狀況是否正常和平衡量表得分能力是為最佳預測變項。
    有關(guān)預后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究,這部份以出院至少半年后芙蘭切活動量表(Frenchay
    Activities Index, FAI)及FIM量表評估結(jié)果做為預后全面性日常生活活動分析數(shù)據(jù)。結(jié)果
    顯示比較發(fā)病前和出院至少半年后訪視時FAI量表及其三大項目(做家務(wù)事、戶外活動及休
    閑工作)得分的退步量在統(tǒng)計學上都有顯著的差異性。發(fā)病前和訪視時FAI量表得分皆與年
    齡呈負相關(guān)性(Pearson r = - 0.24, p< 0.05; r = -0.34, p< 0.001);訪視時FAI量表得
    分和FIM量表得分呈顯著正相關(guān)性(Pearson r = 0.58, p< 0.001)。這些結(jié)果說明使用FAI
    量表可以量化腦中風患者預后生活型態(tài)變化的情形。

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    【英文摘要】
    The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the clinical
    profile, rehabilitation effectiveness and the functional outcomes at
    discharge, to investigate predictive variables of length of rehabilitative

    stay, to identify the prognostic factors about functional independence and

    long-term care institution utilization, and to investigate the lifestyle
    change and analysis of the related factors, at least 6 months after
    discharge
    for stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy. A total of 163
    stroke
    patients who were consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation
    department at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in 1997 were included
    in
    this study.
    The results indicated that Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at
    discharge and gains were used as the index of prognosis. Statistical
    analyses
    indicated that significant improvement in each FIM subscale scores was
    noted.
    Significant predictors of discharge FIM scores include age, previous
    attacks
    twice or over, medical comorbidities, sensory and orientation impairments,
    and
    dementia. In addition, previous stroke attacks twice or over and sensory
    impairment were significant predictors of FIM gains during rehabilitation
    period.
    The mean FIM score was 57.7 ± 24.5 at admission versus 77.3 ± 26.3 at
    discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 ± 0.7) and
    effectiveness (
    30.6 ± 24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation
    efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted
    by
    length of rehabilitation stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and
    arm
    motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the

    rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation
    potential.
    The Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale (FMBS) score at admission accounted for 6% of
    the
    variation in length of stay, once demographic influences were controlled.
    The
    FIM efficiency score could possibly be predicted by the balance ability at

    admission, which accounted for 3% of the variance. However, the balance
    score
    could not provide predictive information about the FIM gain with
    demographic
    factors controlled. These findings suggest that the use of FMBS at
    admission
    to stroke inpatient rehabilitation seemed not to enhance the ability to
    predict rehabilitation outcomes.
    Admission FIM score, shoulder subluxation, bilateral limbs involvement and
    the
    level of education significantly predicted length of stay (LOS). But, the
    variance of the LOS was explained only 21.5%. The results of this study
    suggest that these objective predictors can be used as the basis of
    reimbursement for stroke rehabilitation in case payment system in the
    future.
    Of the 142 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
    discharge,
    23 (16.2%) stroke patients had been functional independence outcome at
    home.
    The results of this study suggest the usefulness of the admission Canadian

    Neurological Scale (CNS) and FIM scores in the prediction of functional
    independence outcome for stroke survivors following rehabilitation
    therapy.
    Of the 151 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
    discharge,
    23 (15.2%) patients had been living in long-term care institutions.
    Whether
    they had (1) limbs bilaterally affected, (2) impaired orientation, or (3)
    poor
    standing ability at discharge were the strongest predictors of long-term
    care
    institution utilization for stroke patients following rehabilitation
    therapy.
    FIM instrument and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) as comprehensive
    assessment
    of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were measured at least 6 months
    following
    the onset of stroke. Significant differences were observed in the FAI
    subscore (domestic chores, outdoor activities, and leisure/work
    activities)
    between prestroke and poststroke status at interview. FAI scores at
    prestroke
    and poststroke status were negatively correlated (r =- 0.24, p < 0.05;
    r=-0.
    35, p<0.001) with age; FAI score was positively correlated (r = 0.58, p <
    0.
    001) with FIM score. The findings indicated that FAI score is useful as a
    quantitative index of the lifestyle change on the prognosis for stroke
    patients.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    【 目 錄 】
    目 錄
    博士論文總摘要 1~3
    Abstract of Dissertation   4~7
    第一章 緒論:前言、文獻探討及本研究目的和規(guī)畫    1-1~14
    第二章 腦中風患者的臨床數(shù)據(jù)和功能恢復情況的研究   2-1~16
    第三章 腦中風患者復健治療預后的初步研究3-1~24
    第四章 初次中風病人復健治療的效率和效果4-1~18
    第五章 腦中風患者住院時平衡能力和預后功能的關(guān)系   5-1~13
    第六章 影響腦中風患者復健治療住院天數(shù)長短的因素   6-1~16
    第七章 影響腦中風患者預后功能獨立的因素 7-1~16
    第八章 影響腦中風患者預后使用長期照護機構(gòu)的因素   8-1~16
    第九章 腦中風患者預后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究     9-1~17
    第十章 結(jié)論:研究成果與未來展望   10-1~13
    附錄一:功能獨立自主量表(Functional Independence Measure, FIM)
    附錄二:福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)
    附錄三:加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)
    附錄四:芙蘭切活動量表(Frenchay Activities Index, FAI)
    附錄五:本研究相關(guān)論文發(fā)表成果
    表目錄
    INDEX OF TABLE
    表2-1.    163位中風病患的基本人口學數(shù)據(jù)
       Demographic data of 163 stroke patients
    表2-2.    住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評估數(shù)據(jù)
       Clinical and diagnostic factors of 163 stroke patients
    表2-3.    住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進步量
       Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient

    rehabilitation
    表2-4.    接受復健治療前后步行及生活能力獨立狀況的人數(shù)比較
       Comparison of number of persons with ambulation and ADL independence
    following rehabilitation therapy
    表3-1.    147位中風病患的基本人口學數(shù)據(jù)
       Demographic data of 147 stroke patients
    表3-2.    住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評估數(shù)據(jù)
       Clinical and diagnostic factors of 147 stroke patients
    表3-3.    住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進步量
       Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient

    rehabilitation
    表3-4.    皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析序位/等距變項和預后功能的間的相關(guān)性
       Pearson correlation for ordinal/interval variables considered in
    predicting functional outcome
    表3-5.    Student's t-test 檢定類別變項和預后功能結(jié)果的間的差異性
       Student's t-test for nominal variables on functional outcome of stroke
    patients
    表3-6.    類別變項和預后功能的間的變異數(shù)分析
       Analysis of variance for nominal variables on functional outcome
    表3-7.    復回歸分析預測中風病人出院FIM量表得分的結(jié)果
       Multiple regression analysis predicting discharge FIM score
    表3-8.    復回歸分析預測中風病人FIM量表進步量的結(jié)果
       Multiple regression analysis predicting FIM improvement
    表4-1.    110位初次中風病患的基本人口學和臨床診斷檢查數(shù)據(jù)
       Clinical and demographic data of first 110 stroke patients
    表4-2.    住院期間功能獨立量表主要項目得分和進步量
       Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient

    rehabilitation
    表4-3.    皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析序位/等距變項和預后功能的間的相關(guān)性
       Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval
    variables and rehabilitation outcome
    表4-4.    Student's t-test 檢定類別變項和預后功能結(jié)果的間的差異性
       Difference between nominal variables and rehabilitation outcome as
    assessed by Student's t-test
    表4-5.    復回歸分析預測110位初次中風病人復健治療的效率和效果
       Multiple regression analyses predicting rehabilitation outcome in 110
    patients with first stroke
    表5-1.    163位中風病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
       Basic data of 163 stroke patients
    表5-2.    皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析平衡能力和住院時FIM量表得分及預后   功能間的相
    關(guān)性
       Pearson's correlation analyses between balance score and FIM score and
    rehabilitation outcome
    表5-3.    復回歸分析剛住院時平衡能力得分和預后功能結(jié)果的關(guān)系
       Multiple regression analyses between admission balance score
    and rehabilitation outcomes
    表6-1.    中風病患的基本數(shù)據(jù) (n=163)
       Basic data of 163 stroke patients
    表6-2.    Pearson 相關(guān)系數(shù)檢定住院天數(shù)長短和等距變項的相關(guān)性
       Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval variables and
    length of rehabilitation stay
    表6-3.    Student's t-test 檢定住院天數(shù)長短和類別變項的差異性
       Difference between nominal variables and length of rehabilitation stay
    as
    assessed by Student's t-test
    表6-4.    相關(guān)影響因素對住院天數(shù)長短的復回歸分析
       Multiple regression analyses predicting length of rehabilitation stay
    表7-1.    中風病人預后功能獨立與否兩組間相關(guān)變項的差異性比較
       Comparison of prospective factors between patients with functional
    independence or dependence
    表7-2.    預后功能獨立與否的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
       Associations between prospective factors and functional independence
    表7-3.    影響中風病患預后功能獨立與否的最佳預測因子
       Selected predictors influencing functional independence outcome
    表8-1.    151位中風病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
       Basic data of 151 stroke patients
    表8-2.    出院后使用長期照護機構(gòu)的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
       Associations between prospective factors and utilization of long-term
    care institution
    表8-3.    影響中風病患出院后使用長期照護機構(gòu)的最佳預測因子
       Selected predictors influencing utilization of long-term care
    institution
    表9-1.    104位首次中風病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
       Basic data of 104 first stroke patients
    表9-2.    中風患者芙蘭切活動量表分數(shù)變化情形
       FAI change on subscale and total score between prestroke and
    post-stroke
    表9-3.    類別變項對于中風患者出院至少半年后FAI量表得分退步的   影響
       Difference between nominal variables and FAI change as assessed by
    Student's t-test
    表9-4.    中風病發(fā)前和出院至少半年后訪視時FAI量表得分及退步量
       與年齡、教育年限及訪視時FIM量表分數(shù)的相關(guān)性
       Pearson's correlation between prestroke FAI score, post-stroke FAI
    score
    at visit, and FAI change and age, the years of
       education, and FIM score at visit
    圖目錄
    INDEX OF FIGURE
    圖 1-1.    研究體系結(jié)構(gòu):中風病人復健治療預后預測因子和功能結(jié)果
        Research framework:predictors and functional outcomes for
    post-stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy
    圖9-1.    中風患者發(fā)病前芙蘭切量表得分分布
        Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
    distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at pre-stroke
    圖9-2.    中風患者預后訪視時芙蘭切量表得分分布
        Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
    distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at post-stroke


    論文關(guān)鍵字:

    【腦中風患者接受住院復健治療預后功能的研究】相關(guān)文章:

    人性化護理干預對改善胃癌手術(shù)患者預后的影響12-06

    阿司匹林聯(lián)合他汀類藥物對老年腦血栓患者預后的影響03-16

    研究老年代謝綜合征患者認知功能障礙的特點03-19

    淺析院前急救護理對急性心肌梗死患者預后的影響12-08

    恩替卡韋治療拉米夫定失效慢性乙肝患者研究01-09

    呼吸機治療危重患者體會03-19

    住院手術(shù)患者抗生素使用狀況分析11-20

    急性腦出血早期血糖水平及其預后關(guān)系研究03-08

    研究針灸治療肥胖03-19

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区| 国产亚州精品女人久久久久久| 日韩精品国产自在久久现线拍| 日韩精品欧美激情国产一区| 青青青青久久精品国产| 无码日韩精品一区二区三区免费 | 92精品国产自产在线观看| 精品免费人成视频app| 香蕉99久久国产综合精品宅男自| 国产VA免费精品高清在线| 国产成人精品免费视频大全麻豆| 日产精品99久久久久久| 一本一道久久a久久精品综合| 精品久久久久久久中文字幕 | 无码人妻精品一区二| 国产精品一香蕉国产线看观看| 欧美激情精品久久久久| 九九热在线视频观看这里只有精品| 国产久热精品无码激情| 精品一区二区三区在线成人| 亚洲AV永久青草无码精品| 在线亚洲精品福利网址导航| 亚洲AⅤ永久无码精品AA| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品一区四| 99久久综合国产精品二区| 亚洲国产精品成| 夜色www国产精品资源站| 四虎4hu永久免费国产精品| 久久99热国产这有精品| 久久99国产精品久久| 久久久久国产精品| 2021年精品国产福利在线| 四虎在线精品视频一二区| 午夜精品美女自拍福到在线| 99视频在线精品国自产拍亚瑟| 国产99久久久国产精品~~牛| 国产精品九九九| 精品国产不卡一区二区三区| 看99视频日韩精品| 亚洲国产精品尤物yw在线| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线|