<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

    時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
    • 相關推薦

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Question:

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

      In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

      Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

      Required:

      In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

      Answer:

      The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

      There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

      Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

      When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

      It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

      Remedies for breach of contract

      (i) Specific performance

      It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

      (ii) Damages

      A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

    【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關文章:

    ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓練試題03-19

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習試題03-19

    《論語》試題及答案04-19

    為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

    acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

    Indesign認證試題及答案03-17

    excel操作試題及答案03-19

    photoshop試題附答案07-15

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 99热都是精品久久久久久| 精品一卡2卡三卡4卡免费视频| 精品一区二区三区高清免费观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又仑精品| 免费短视频软件精品一区二区| 国产AV国片精品| 伊人久久精品影院| 国产亚洲色婷婷久久99精品91| 97久久综合精品久久久综合| 亚洲欧美精品AAAAAA片| 精品日韩欧美国产| 97国产视频精品| 久久亚洲国产欧洲精品一| 久久国产乱子伦免费精品| 亚洲视频在线精品| 久久久精品视频免费观看| 中国精品videossex中国高清| 91精品成人免费国产| 国产精品内射久久久久欢欢| 2022年国产精品久久久久| 日韩欧精品无码视频无删节| 亚洲高清国产拍精品青青草原| 国产精品成人精品久久久| 精品一区二区三区免费 | 国产精品日韩AV在线播放| 最新欧美性爱精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久久国产免费| 99在线观看视频免费精品9| 国产人成精品午夜在线观看| 97精品伊人久久大香线蕉app | 1区1区3区4区产品芒果精品| 91视频精品全国免费观看| 成人区人妻精品一区二区不卡网站 | 欧美精品免费在线| 精品国产污污免费网站| 国产精品自产拍在线观看| 日韩一级精品视频在线观看| 尤物国产在线精品福利一区| 伊人久久大香线蕉精品| 国产精品乱码一区二区三区|