<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

    時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
    • 相關(guān)推薦

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Question:

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

      In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

      Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

      Required:

      In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

      Answer:

      The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

      There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

      Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

      When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

      It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

      Remedies for breach of contract

      (i) Specific performance

      It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

      (ii) Damages

      A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

    【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關(guān)文章:

    ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓(xùn)練試題03-19

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習(xí)試題03-19

    《論語》試題及答案04-19

    為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

    acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

    Indesign認(rèn)證試題及答案03-17

    excel操作試題及答案03-19

    photoshop試題附答案07-15

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 无码精品人妻一区二区三区漫画| 国产精品无码一区二区三级| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久| 国产精品无套内射迪丽热巴| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网站| 精品久久久久久无码人妻蜜桃| 久久国产香蕉一区精品| 国产女主播精品大秀系列| 四虎国产精品永免费| 国产精品亚洲玖玖玖在线观看| 国产精品福利在线观看| 奇米精品视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品碰碰| 久久久精品久久久久特色影视| 成人精品一区二区三区| 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 国产成人无码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃图片| 久久久一本精品99久久精品66 | 国产国产成人久久精品| 国产精品久久久久久影院| 91精品国产色综合久久| 精品亚洲aⅴ在线观看| 漂亮人妻被黑人久久精品| 久久久久久夜精品精品免费啦| 日韩精品无码中文字幕一区二区| 国99精品无码一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲AV香蕉| 伊人久久精品无码二区麻豆| 青春草无码精品视频在线观 | 97精品伊人久久大香线蕉app| 久久亚洲精品国产精品| 老司机性色福利精品视频| 中文精品99久久国产 | Xx性欧美肥妇精品久久久久久| 亚洲嫩草影院久久精品| 一区二区三区精品| 国产精品免费大片一区二区| 国产乱人伦精品一区二区在线观看| 精品久久人人做人人爽综合|