<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • 大學(xué)英語(yǔ)演講稿:Opening Statement

    時(shí)間:2024-06-20 02:54:46 大學(xué)英語(yǔ) 我要投稿
    • 相關(guān)推薦

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)演講稿:Opening Statement

      Mr. Chairman, Senator Thurmond, members of the committee, my name is Anita F. Hill, and I am a professor of law at the University of Oklahoma. I was born on a farm in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, in 1956. I am the youngest of 13 children. I had my early education in Okmulgee County. My father, Albert Hill, is a farmer in that area. My mother's name is Irma Hill. She is also a farmer and a housewife.

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)演講稿:Opening Statement

      My childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. I was reared in a religious atmosphere in the Baptist faith, and I have been a member of the Antioch Baptist Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, since 1983. It is a very warm part of my life at the present time.

      For my undergraduate work, I went to Oklahoma State University and graduated from there in 1977. I am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.

      I graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the Yale Law School, where I received my JD degree in 1980. Upon graduation from law school, I became a practicing lawyer with the Washington, DC, firm of Ward, Hardraker, and Ross.

      In 1981, I was introduced to now Judge Thomas by a mutual friend. Judge Thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if I would be interested in working with him. He was, in fact, appointed as Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights. After he had taken that post, he asked if I would become his assistant, and I accepted that position.

      In my early period there, I had two major projects. The first was an article I wrote for Judge Thomas' signature on the education of minority students. The second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because Judge Thomas transferred to the EEOC where he became the chairman of that office.

      During this period at the Department of Education, my working relationship with Judge Thomas was positive. I had a good deal of responsibility and independence. I thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. After approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.

      What happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.

      I declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that I thought it would jeopardize what at the time I considered to be a very good working relationship. I had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. I believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. I was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.

      I thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. However, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. He pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. These incidents took place in his office or mine. They were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.

      My working relationship became even more strained when Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex. On these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. After a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.

      His conversations were very vivid. He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. He talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts. On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.

      Because I was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, I told him that I did not want to talk about these subjects. I would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. My efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.

      Throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. My reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. This was difficult because at the time I was his only assistant at the Office of Education -- or Office for Civil Rights.

      During the latter part of my time at the Department of Education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended. I began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.

      When Judge Thomas was made chair of the EEOC, I needed to face the question of whether to go with him. I was asked to do so, and I did. The work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended. I also faced the realistic fact that I had no alternative job. While I might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, I was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field. Moreover, the Department of Education itself was a dubious venture. President Reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.

      For my first months at the EEOC, where I continued to be an assistant to Judge Thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures. However, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again. The comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why I didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance. I remember his saying that some day I would have to tell him the real reason that I wouldn't go out with him.

    【大學(xué)英語(yǔ)演講稿:Opening Statement】相關(guān)文章:

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)閱讀08-18

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞的時(shí)態(tài)10-05

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)簡(jiǎn)短名言精選07-19

    災(zāi)難大學(xué)英語(yǔ)作文06-20

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)自學(xué)教程10-03

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)Cambridge University09-12

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)b分值06-08

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)的學(xué)習(xí)原則08-22

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)閱讀題06-16

    大學(xué)英語(yǔ)必備諺語(yǔ)08-13

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久精品视频免费观看| 国产精品美女网站在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品伊人久久| 精品视频第一页| 日韩精品在线观看视频| 伊人精品久久久久7777| 久久香蕉国产线看观看精品yw| 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲产成人| 国产成人精品优优av| 精品久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看你懂的| 国产精品无码久久久久久| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费午夜| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本| 91精品国产福利尤物| 91精品国产自产在线老师啪| 精品日韩欧美国产| 好属妞这里只有精品久久| 精品亚洲成AV人在线观看| 一区二区三区精品国产欧美| 精品久久久久久国产潘金莲 | 99热精品久久只有精品| 久久国产精品免费| 91麻豆精品国产91久久久久久| 99国产精品无码| 久久精品国产亚洲AV大全| 亚洲精品国产成人影院| 69久久夜色精品国产69| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费视频| 日本熟妇亚洲欧美精品区| 国产精品VA在线观看无码不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人精品无码区 | 亚洲人成国产精品无码| 日韩蜜芽精品视频在线观看| 免费视频精品一区二区| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院| 四虎国产精品永久地址入口| 久久精品无码一区二区三区免费| 国产三级精品三级在线观看专1| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久久久久久久 |