GMAT優秀備考范文精選
In this argument, the head of a government department concludes that the department does not need to strengthen either its ethics regulations or its enforcement mechanisms in order to encourage ethical behavior by companies with which it does business. The first reason given is that businesses have agreed to follow the departments existing code of ethics. The second reason is that the existing code is relevant to the current business environment. This argument is unacceptable for several reasons.
The sole support for the claim that stronger enforcement mechanisms are unnecessary comes from the assumption that companies will simply keep their promises to follow the existing code. But, since the department head clearly refers to rules violations by these same businesses within the past year, his faith in their word is obviously misplaced. Moreover, it is commonly understood that effective rules carry with them methods of enforcement and penalties for violations.
To show that a strengthened code is unnecessary, the department head claims that the existing code of ethics is relevant. In partial clarification of the vague term relevant, we are told that the existing code was approved in direct response to violations occurring in the past year. If the full significance of being relevant is that the code responds to last years violations, then the department head must assume that those violations will be representative of all the kinds of ethics problems that concern the department. This is unlikely; in addition, thinking so produces an oddly short-sighted idea of relevance.
【GMAT優秀備考范文精選】相關文章：
備考資料：GMAT優秀范文精選07-22
GMAT優秀作文備考精選08-05
GMAT備考優秀作文精選01-29
GMAT優秀備考作文精選07-23
備考GMAT優秀作文精選07-22
備考資料之GMAT優秀作文精選范文07-23
備考資料GMAT優秀作文范文08-05
備考資料：GMAT優秀作文范文01-28
備考資料:GMAT優秀作文范文07-24