<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • 著名優(yōu)秀英語演講稿

    時(shí)間:2021-09-02 09:03:39 英語演講稿 我要投稿

    著名優(yōu)秀英語演講稿

      演講稿以發(fā)表意見,表達(dá)觀點(diǎn)為主,是為演講而事先準(zhǔn)備好的文稿。在充滿活力,日益開放的今天,在很多情況下我們需要用到演講稿,相信很多朋友都對寫演講稿感到非?鄲腊,以下是小編幫大家整理的著名優(yōu)秀英語演講稿,供大家參考借鑒,希望可以幫助到有需要的朋友。

    著名優(yōu)秀英語演講稿

      OF WHAT USE is a college training? We who have had it seldom hear the question raised might be a little nonplussed to answer it offhand. A certain amount of meditation has brought me to this as the pithiest reply which I myself can give: The best claim that a college education can possibly make on your respect, the best thing it can aspire to accomplish for you, is this: that it should help you to know a good man when you see him. This is as true of women's as of men's colleges; but that it is neither a joke nor a one-sided abstraction I shall now endeavor to show.

      What talk do we commonly hear about the contrast between college education and the education which business or technical or professional schools confer? The college education is called higher because it is supposed to be so general and so disinterested. At the schools you get a relatively narrow practical skill, you are told, whereas the colleges give you the more liberal culture, the broader outlook, the historical perspective, the philosophic atmosphere, or something which phrases of that sort try to express. You are made into an efficient instrument for doing a definite thing, you hear, at the schools; but, apart from that, you may remain a crude and smoky kind of petroleum, incapable of spreading light. The universities and colleges, on the other hand, although they may leave you less efficient for this or that practical task, suffuse your whole mentality with something more important than skill. They redeem you, make you well-bred; they make good company of you mentally. If they find you with a naturally boorish or caddish mind, they cannot leave you so, as a technical school may leave you. This, at least, is pretended; this is what we hear among college-trained people when they compare their education with every other sort. Now, exactly how much does this signify?

      It is certain, to begin with, that the narrowest trade or professional training does something more for a man than to make a skilful practical tool of him t makes him also a judge of other men's skill. Whether his trade be pleading at the bar or surgery or plastering or plumbing, it develops a critical sense in him for that sort of occupation. He understands the difference between second-rate and first-rate work in his whole branch of industry; he gets to know a good job in his own line as soon as he sees it; and getting to know this in his own line, he gets a faint sense of what good work may mean anyhow, that may, if circumstances favor, spread into his judgments elsewhere. Sound work, clean work, finished work; feeble work, slack work, sham work hese words express an identical contrast in many different departments of activity. In so far forth, then, even the humblest manual trade may beget in one a certain small degree of power to judge of good work generally.

      Now, what is supposed to be the line of us who have the higher college training? Is there any broader line ince our education claims primarily not to be narrow n which we also are made good judges between what is first-rate and what is second-rate only? What is especially taught in the colleges has long been known by the name of the humanities, and these are often identified with Greek and Latin. But it is only as literatures, not as languages, that Greek and Latin have any general humanity-value; so that in a broad sense the humanities mean literature primarily, and in a still broader sense the study of masterpieces in almost any field of human endeavor. Literature keeps the primacy; for it not only consists of masterpieces but is largely about masterpieces, being little more than an appreciative chronicle of human master-strokes, so far as it takes the form of criticism and history. You can give humanistic value to almost anything by reaching it historically. Geology, economics, mechanics, are humanities when taught with reference to the successive achievements of the geniuses to which these sciences owe their being. Not taught thus, literature remains grammar, art a catalogue, history a list of dates, and natural science a sheet of formulas and weights and measures.

      The sifting of human creations! othing less than this is what we ought to mean by the humanities. Essentially this means biography; what our colleges should teach is, therefore, biographical history, that not of politics merely, but of anything and everything so far as human efforts and conquests are factors that have played their part. Studying in this way, we learn what types of activity have stood the test of time; we acquire standards of the excellent and durable. All our arts and sciences and institutions are but so many quests of perfection on the part of men; and when we see how diverse the types of excellence may be, how various the tests, how flexible the adaptations, we gain a richer sense of what the terms better and worse may signify in general. Our critical sensibilities grow both more acute and less fanatical. We sympathize with men's mistakes even in the act of penetrating them; we feel the pathos of lost causes and misguided epochs even while we applaud what overcame them.

      Such words are vague and such ideas are inadequate, but their meaning is unmistakable. What the colleges eaching humanities by examples which may be special, but which must be typical and pregnant hould at least try to give us, is a general sense of what, under various disguises, superiority has always signified and may still signify. The feeling for a good human job anywhere, the admiration of the really admirable the disesteem of what is cheap and trashy and impermanent his is what we call the critical sense, the sense for ideal values. It is the better part of what men know as wisdom. Some of us are wise in this way naturally and by genius; some of us never become so. But to have spent one's youth at college, in contact with the choice and rare and precious, and yet still to be a blind prig or vulgarian, unable to scent out human excellence or to divine it amid its accidents, to know it only when ticketed and labeled and forced on us by others, this indeed should be accounted the very calamity and shipwreck of a higher education.

    【著名優(yōu)秀英語演講稿】相關(guān)文章:

    莎士比亞英語名言著名06-13

    英語優(yōu)秀演講稿9篇12-22

    英語口語優(yōu)秀演講稿12-01

    英語優(yōu)秀演講稿(8篇)10-28

    英語優(yōu)秀演講稿8篇10-28

    世界著名旅游景點(diǎn)英語詞匯05-26

    世界著名諺語06-09

    《簡愛》著名語錄09-13

    職場著名法則07-31

    優(yōu)秀英語演講稿3篇12-01

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品天天看天天狠| 99精品久久久久中文字幕| 99在线精品视频在线观看| 久久久久99精品成人片三人毛片| 精品国产一区AV天美传媒| 久久久精品日本一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产免费一区| 亚洲精品V欧洲精品V日韩精品| 成人精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品国产| 国产精品成人观看视频国产奇米| 区亚洲欧美一级久久精品亚洲精品成人网久久久久 | 欧美成人精品一区二区综合| 精品国产v无码大片在线观看| 国内精品视频九九九九| 精品欧洲av无码一区二区| 亚洲国产精品视频| 拍国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 国产三级精品三级在线观看| 2022国产精品最新在线| 国产精品视频一区二区三区经| 精品人妻系列无码天堂| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES| 亚洲精品视频在线观看你懂的| 欧美日韩专区麻豆精品在线 | 黄床大片免费30分钟国产精品| 白浆都出来了视频国产精品 | 国产精品一区二区久久精品无码 | 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区 | 麻豆国产在线精品国偷产拍| 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区在线观看| 99久久国产主播综合精品 | 亚洲精品无码国产| 亚洲αv在线精品糸列| 午夜DY888国产精品影院| 色久综合网精品一区二区| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕av蜜桃| 午夜精品射精入后重之免费观看| 日本午夜精品一区二区三区电影|